ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceptions on continuing medical education credit system: a cross-sectional study in Sichuan Province, China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Continuing Medical Education (CME) is vital for maintaining and improving the competencies of healthcare professionals. Despite the recognized importance of CME, disparities in CME engagement across professional roles remain underexplored in China. This study aims to addresses this gap by analyzing the participation and credit compliance of healthcare professionals in CME programs at a hospital in Guangdong Province over a five-year period (2019-2023) and to explore the differences across different professional titles and specializations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,156 records from the hospital's proprietary electronic CME management system. All full-time clinical staff were included. Descriptive statistics quantified annual average participation and credit compliance rates. Chi-square tests (χ²) assessed differences by title and specialty. Results: The results indicate that over the past five years, both CME participation and credit compliance steadily increased. Significant differences were observed in participation among healthcare professionals with different professional titles ( Conclusion: Significant disparities in CME participation and credit compliance were observed across professional titles and clinical specialties. The findings suggest that CME programs should be tailored to the specific needs of different professional groups. These insights provide valuable recommendations for policymakers and hospital administrators seeking to optimizing CME program design, enhancing participation, and improving healthcare quality through continued professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.