Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896348›Full record

ArticleIntegrative medicine research2025

Acupuncture versus cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety among cancer survivors with insomnia: An exploratory analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Eunbin Kwag, Xiaotong Li, Sheila Garland, Karolina Bryl, Lauren Taylor, Qing S Li, Lindsay Amann, Jun J Mao, Kelly M McConnell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02356575 (Choosing Options for Insomnia in Cancer Effectively), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02356575 nacompletednot on this map

Choosing Options for Insomnia in Cancer Effectively (CHOICE): A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Acupuncture and Cognitive Behavior Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2017Enrolled160ConditionsInsomnia, CancerArmsAcupuncture, Cognitive Behavior Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eunbin KwagIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Xiaotong LiIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Sheila GarlandDepartment of Psychology and Oncology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Karolina BrylIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Lauren TaylorIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Qing S LiIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Lindsay AmannIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jun J MaoIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Kelly M McConnellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anxiety and insomnia frequently co-occur among cancer survivors and are strongly interconnected, yet no widely accepted intervention simultaneously targets both symptoms. Methods: Data were drawn from a dual-center, parallel-group, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial evaluating acupuncture versus CBT-I for insomnia. Seventy-six participants with baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) scores of ≥8 were included. Both interventions were administered over eight weeks, with follow-up until 20 weeks. Anxiety was assessed at baseline, week 8, and week 20 using HADS-A. A linear mixed-effects model was used to examine mean change in HADS-A scores. Additionally, responder analyses were conducted, with insomnia and anxiety responders defined as patients demonstrating clinically meaningful improvements in either outcome by week 8. Results: Both CBT-I and acupuncture significantly reduced HADS-A scores at week 8 (CBT-I: -3.75; acupuncture: -3.14) and week 20 (CBT-I: -3.05; acupuncture: -2.66) compared to baseline (all p < 0.001). There was no between-group difference (p=0.85). In responder analyses, CBT-I showed greater anxiety reduction in insomnia responders (-4.62) than non-responders (-0.45), at both time points (week 8: Conclusion: Both acupuncture and CBT-I effectively manage comorbid anxiety and insomnia in cancer survivors. Acupuncture may address these symptoms independently, while CBT-I may improve them in an interconnected manner. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration (NCT02356575).

Indexed as

AcupunctureAnxietyCancer survivorsCBT-IInsomnia

Identifiers

PMID40896348
PMCPMC12395375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.