ArticleIntegrative medicine research2025
Development of core outcome set for healthy aging treatment in primary care settings.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthy aging is a global public health priority, with increasing interest in the promotion of functional ability and well-being among older adults. South Korea's rapidly aging population highlights the need for standardized evaluation tools for interventions. This study aimed to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for healthy aging treatment in primary care. Methods: The COS was developed following the COS-STAD guidelines and through a multiphase process, including a literature review and a modified Delphi consensus. A project management group (PMG) reviewed studies related to health promotion programs and generated an initial list of outcomes. This list was refined through two rounds of Delphi surveys involving 16 experts. Consensus was assessed using content validity ratio, degree of consensus, and convergence. Results: Twenty-six studies informed the initial outcome list, resulting in 24 outcomes for the Delphi evaluation. Two Delphi rounds and a final review by the PMG established a COS comprising 12 outcomes. These included EQ-5D, Geriatric Depression Scale, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, body weight, blood pressure, blood glucose, blood lipids, liver function, kidney function, Korean Frailty Index, Self-rated Health, and Kidney-Deficiency Score. Conclusions: The COS provides a standardized set of outcomes for evaluating healthy aging interventions in primary care. Its application in primary care and health promotion programs may enhance comparability across studies and support evidence-based decision making. Future revisions are recommended based on clinical applications and emerging research findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.