ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025
The acoustic startle response in 22q11 deletion syndrome: from animal models to humans.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suppressive Genetic Interactions Between Haploinsufficient Mitochondrial Genes Encoded in the 22q11.2 Microdeletion Locus Define Brain and Cardiac Phenotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The startle response is a reflexive contraction of skeletal musculature in response to a strong acoustic stimulus that is evolutionarily preserved across species. There is a broad and comprehensive literature connecting components of the startle response such as latency, magnitude and pre-pulse inhibition, to psychosis status and risk. In this review, we examine the startle response in human subjects with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22qDel) and in analogous animal models. 22qDel is a copy number variant disorder typically involving ~1.5 to 3 Mb of DNA on the proximal 22q region, which occurs in approximately 1 in 2000-6,000 births, and serves as the most robust single genetic predictor of psychosis risk (conferring ~30x higher risk). By comparing the human literature directly to the genetic mouse models, we identify areas of convergence and divergence between human and animal results and highlight gaps related to differences in neurodevelopmental stages, experimental design, stimulus outcome measurements, and genetic deletion areas in each animal model. We then highlight the translational power of the acoustic startle response and how it can be studied in conjunction with more basic cellular investigations related to basic neural function and responsiveness. Because the acoustic startle response is seen across vertebrate species with well characterized circuitry, we argue for using the acoustic startle response as a translational biological probe of underlying neurobiology relevant to 22qDel and by extension, psychosis and psychosis risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.