Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896337›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Neurocardiac signatures of acute mental stress: a sex-comparative study.

Selina C Wriessnegger, Lena Lorenzer, Kyriaki Kostoglou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selina C WriessneggerInstitute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Lena LorenzerDivision of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kyriaki KostoglouInstitute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mental stress affects nearly everyone, with individual responses varying greatly. The importance of studying mental stress has increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stress has wide-ranging health impacts, from elevating blood pressure to contributing to depression and neurodegenerative conditions. Methods: This work aimed to uncover reliable correlates of mental stress using Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Electrocardiogram (ECG) methods, with an additional focus on sex differences. Twenty-five volunteers performed time-constrained mental arithmetic tasks under stress, amplified by workspace noise and negative feedback. Results: Response-locked heart rate (HR) data revealed a parasympathetic deceleration at response onset, followed by sympathetic rebound, with deeper HR dips linked to higher stress levels. Men showed earlier, longer-lasting HR decelerations, suggesting a time-based regulation strategy, while women exhibited larger, short-lived HR swings during slower responses, indicating an intensity-based response. Neural responses revealed also sex-specific stress effects: in females, stress modulated frontal theta, beta, and the theta/beta ratio-markers of cognitive control. In males, stress increased gamma and decreased delta power, indicating possibly heightened arousal and reduced motor preparation, respectively. While alpha asymmetry was modulated in both sexes, its behavioral relevance and spatial patterns differed. Discussion: These findings highlight the need for sex-specific models in neuroadaptive systems and stress-monitoring technologies.

Indexed as

alpha asymmetryECGEEGmental arithmetic taskmental stressresponse-locked heart ratesex differences

Identifiers

PMID40896337
PMCPMC12392923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.