ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Kinaesthetic empathy through the lens of the cinematographer: physiological and phenomenological alignments in the act of creation.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal Biometric Framework for Evaluating Emotional Impact of Chromatic Manipulation in Cinematic Content.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Film and actor-driven narratives showcase a structured and authentic depiction of emotions, and are considered a reliable resource for validating affective states when coupled with physiological data. In affective computing studies, emotional engagement is often portrayed and perceived as a single-directional mode of interaction between the viewer and the elicitation material. We design a study from the perspective of the cinematographer, who is actively engaged in the creation of the source material while witnessing it. Thus, the image emerges in the interaction between the cinematographer "reading" the actors during the filming, and visa-versa. The captured movement, physiological data, and first-person accounts are gathered from six participants and organized into a multimodal dataset. From this, we introduce a phenomenological data explorer framework, a visualization tool that's used to assess the affective and motor responses during the filming process, while considering the phenomenological experience and narrative immediacy. In turn, we draw triangulations between visual perception, sensorimotor patterns and narrative structures to inform the bidirectional nature of empathic engagement in cinematic storytelling. Our findings emphasize the role of kinaesthetic empathy, in which embodied decision-making responds to predicted inner states, shaping and modulating emotional understanding throughout the filming process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.