ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
One Man's Meat Is Another Man's Poison: High Incidence of Severe Cutaneous Drug Reactions Induced by Enfortumab Vedotin.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4 and linked to monomethyl auristatin E, has shown efficacy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, emerging evidence has identified severe cutaneous adverse events (cAEs), particularly Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). To date, no comprehensive analysis of cAEs associated with EV has been reported. This study aims to investigate the incidence, onset time, and factors associated with cAEs, particularly SJS/TEN, in patients treated with EV, using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from January 1, 2020 to November 1, 2024, covering 2736 patients. A disproportionality analysis and positive signal detection were used to assess the correlation between EV and adverse events (AEs). Logistic regression was employed to evaluate the factors associated with the occurrence of AEs. Key findings and limitations: Among the 2736 patients analyzed, a total of 6520 AEs were reported. Skin-related AEs were most frequent, accounting for 1027 cases (37.54%), with SJS/TEN occurring in 8.59% of cases. Our analysis shows that most cAEs occurred within 30 d of starting EV treatment, with SJS/TEN onset peaking at 14 d. Within the category of skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, 54 skin-related AEs had one or more positive signals, and 43 cases had three or more positive signals. The factors associated with skin-limited AEs included prior immunotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.15; Conclusions and clinical implications: Our study highlights a higher incidence of cAEs during EV treatment, particularly severe cAEs such as SJS/TEN. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring and proactive management of these AEs in clinical practice, especially in high-risk populations. Patient summary: Our study shows that a significant number of patients treated with enfortumab vedotin experienced serious skin reactions. We found that certain factors, such as previous immunotherapy and being male, increased the risk of these reactions. These imply that doctors need to watch patients closely when using this drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.