Performance of piezoelectric and triboelectric transducers under gait loading for energy harvesting and load monitoring in total knee replacements.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Machine Learning-Based Force and Activity Recognition in Total Knee Replacement Using Hybrid Triboelectric/Piezoelectric PVDF Sensors.Nano energy · 2026
   Article
2. Portable electronic devices for mechanotherapy and operative treatment of osteoarthritis.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2026
   Review
3. Wearable technology for athletes: material innovations, performance monitoring, and emerging paradigms.Mikrochimica acta · 2026
   Review
4. State-of-the-Art Power Transfer Methods in Triboelectric Energy Harvesters.IEEE circuits and systems magazine (New York, N.Y. : 2001)
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as