ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Development and validation of the Multidimensional Clinical Empathy Scale for healthcare professionals and students.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-care and emotional engagement in therapeutic contexts: a predictive study of healthcare practitioners.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical empathy is a crucial skill for healthcare professionals, enhancing patient outcomes, and satisfaction. However, existing scales, such as the Jefferson Scale of Empathy, focus primarily on cognitive empathy, overlooking the affective component. This gap highlights the need for a validated tool that measures both cognitive and affective empathy in healthcare professionals. This study developed and validated a multidimensional scale-the Multidimensional Clinical Empathy Scale-for assessing both cognitive and affective empathy in healthcare professionals and students. Methods: This three-phase study involved item generation, reduction, and validation, using literature reviews, qualitative studies, and survey methodologies. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to test the scale's validity. The Multidimensional Clinical Empathy Scale was constructed using a five-domain theoretical model: Empathetic Connections, Valuing Empathy, Empathetic Behaviours, Genuine Concern, and Perspective Taking. After content validation and exploratory factor analysis, the scale was reduced to 26 items with high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha of 0.94). Results: There were a total of 977 participants, comprising doctors, medical students, nurses, and nursing students from acute hospitals, community hospitals, medical schools, and nursing schools. The final 26-item Multidimensional Clinical Empathy Scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with factor loadings confirming the multidimensionality of clinical empathy. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the scale's four-factor structure, and the scale was validated across diverse healthcare settings with robust reliability and Content Validity Index (0.90). Conclusions: The Multidimensional Clinical Empathy Scale provides a comprehensive, validated tool for measuring both cognitive and affective empathy in healthcare professionals and students. Its multidimensional structure offers potential for broader applications in clinical education and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.