Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896222›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Predicting suicidality in people living with HIV in Uganda: a machine learning approach.

Anthony B Mutema, Lillian Linda, Daudi Jjingo, Segun Fatumo, Eugene Kinyanda, Allan Kalungi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anthony B MutemaAfrican Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Data Intensive Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lillian LindaAfrican Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Data Intensive Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Daudi JjingoAfrican Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Data Intensive Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Segun FatumoMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRC/UVRI and LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Eugene KinyandaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRC/UVRI and LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Allan KalungiMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRC/UVRI and LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People living with HIV (PLWH) are more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and exhibit suicidal behavior than the general population. However, there are currently no effective methods of predicting who is likely to experience suicidal thoughts and behavior. Machine learning (ML) approaches can be leveraged to develop models that evaluate the complex etiology of suicidal behavior, facilitating the timely identification of at-risk individuals and promoting individualized treatment allocation. Materials and methods: This retrospective case-control study used longitudinal sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical data of 1,126 PLWH from Uganda to evaluate the potential of ML in predicting suicidality. In addition, suicidality polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated for a subset of 282 study participants and incorporated as an additional feature in the model to determine if including genomic information improves overall model performance. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and Mathew's correlation coefficient (MCC). Results: We trained and evaluated eight different ML algorithms, including logistic regression, support vector machines, Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forests, AdaBoost, and gradient-boosting classifiers. Cost-sensitive AdaBoost emerged as the best model, achieving an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.87), a sensitivity of 0.63, a specificity of 0.74, a PPV of 0.36, and an NPV of 0.89 on unseen baseline data. The model demonstrated good generalizability, predicting prevalent and incident suicidality at 12-month follow-up with an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.81) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.76), respectively. Incorporating PRS as an additional feature in the model resulted in a 6% improvement in model sensitivity and a 9% reduction in specificity. A positive MDD diagnosis and high stress contributed the most to predicting suicidality risk. Conclusion: A cost-sensitive AdaBoost model developed using the sociodemographic, psychosocial, and clinical data of PLWH in Uganda can predict suicidality risk, albeit with modest PPV. Incorporating suicidality PRS improved the overall predictive performance of the model. However, larger studies involving more diverse participants are needed to evaluate the potential of PRS in enhancing risk stratification and the clinical utility of the prediction model.

Indexed as

HIVmachine learningpolygenic risk scorespredictionsuicidality

Identifiers

PMID40896222
PMCPMC12394506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.