ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
New arenas of inclusion: experiences of individuals with intellectual disability employed in higher education.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prior studies have found that people with intellectual disabilities (ID) often experience being excluded from important parts of society, and unemployment and lack of social connections may severely negatively impact quality of life for people with ID. Methods: Five persons with ID participating in a project at a Norwegian University were interviewed, with a particular emphasis on how they experienced social inclusion at this non-sheltered work environment. The participants also worked in a sheltered environment. The data analysis was performed in accordance with the method of thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes that emerged from the data: 1) 'Experienced employees', indicating that the participants had worked in different types of jobs and evaluated their current work positively in light of prior work experiences; 2) 'Suitable work challenges', implying that the participants described having had some influence over their work and were generally satisfied with their assignments; 3) 'Social belonging', demonstrating how the participants underlined the importance of meeting new people, expanding their network and being appreciated at work. Discussion: The participants were generally satisfied with work at the University, and reported feeling included through the forming of relationships with other people at the workplace. However, they also emphasised the importance of their work in a sheltered environment, where they felt secure and had friends. Conclusion: The participant described experiences of belonging and being included when at work at the University. A combination of sheltered and non-sheltered work seemed to be experienced positively by the participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.