Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896195›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of digital earth2024

Modeling the Impacts of Governmental and Human Responses on COVID-19 Spread Using Statistical Machine Learning.

Binbin Lin, Yimin Dai, Lei Zou, Ning Ning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of digital earth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Binbin LinDepartment of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Yimin DaiDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Lei ZouDepartment of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Ning NingDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

Inference of heterogeneous transmission of antimicrobial resistant pathogens in health care settingsR21AI180492 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PEI, SEN · 2024 to 2025
$439k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI180492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impacts of governmental and human responses on the pandemic control is imperative for forecasting pandemic spread under various responsive scenarios and guiding localized interventions before pharmaceutical interventions are available. This study analyzed multiple data sets, including social media, mobility, policy evaluations, and COVID-19 infection reports, to delineate the interactions between governmental and human responses and COVID-19 spread in the United States in 2020 when vaccinations were unavailable. The contributions are (1) uncovering the spatiotemporal variations in governmental and human responses during COVID-19; (2) developing a statistical machine learning algorithm that incorporates spatiotemporal dependencies and temporal lag effects to model the relationships between governmental and human responses and the pandemic spread; (3) dissecting the impacts of human responses on the pandemic across space and time. Results reveal that the determinants of COVID-19 health impacts transitioned from human mobility during the initial outbreak phase to both human mobility and stay-at-home policies during the rapid spread phase, and ultimately to the compound of human mobility, stay-at-home policies and the public awareness in the full-blown phase. These findings furnish guidance for policymakers in implementing adaptive and phased strategies.

Indexed as

Bayesian ModelCOVID-19Geospatial dataHuman ResponsesSpatiotemporal

Identifiers

PMID40896195
PMCPMC12393034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.