Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896134›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

UMATBrush: A dataset of inertial signals of toothbrushing activities.

F J González-Cañete, E Casilari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F J González-CañeteDepartamento de Tecnología Electrónica, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
E CasilariDepartamento de Tecnología Electrónica, Telecommunication Research Institute (TELMA), Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartwatches and other commercially available wrist-worn devices have become a low-cost tool which, in recent years, has gained enormous popularity for monitoring habits associated with a healthy lifestyle. In this regard, the increasing computational power of smartwatches is facilitating the integration of complex machine learning and deep learning algorithms, which implement manual activity recognizers based on the inertial sensor signals that these wearables natively include. One specific application of such human activity recognition (HAR) systems is the monitoring of toothbrushing, aimed at fostering oral health habits among the population. For the evaluation and testing of these types of detectors, having access to databases of inertial signals captured by smartwatches is of paramount importance. This work describes the UMATBrush repository, which results from monitoring four experimental subjects during a large number of toothbrushing sessions using three commercial smartwatches. In contrast to other similar repositories, which are focused on the generic development of detectors for a limited set of manual activities, this repository also includes long periods of monitoring of the subjects during their daily lives. In the dataset, each acceleration sample captured by the watches is binary labelled as either corresponding or not to a toothbrushing session. In this way, potential classifiers using these traces could be trained and validated under realistic conditions, by learning to distinguish the toothbrushing operation from other real-life activities.

Indexed as

AccelerometerHuman activity recognitionInertial sensorsSmartwatchesWearables

Identifiers

PMID40896134
PMCPMC12396274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.