Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896106›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Functional and Phylogenetic Structure of Forest Bird Assemblages Along an Afrotropical Elevational Gradient.

Riccardo Pernice, Ondřej Sedláček, Tomáš Albrecht, Oldřich Tomášek, Ondřej Kauzál, Tereza Kauzálová, Francis Njie Motombi, Francis Luma Ewome, Michal Ferenc, Kryštof Chmel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Riccardo PerniceDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-5467
Ondřej SedláčekDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic.
Tomáš AlbrechtCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology Brno Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9213-0034
Oldřich TomášekCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology Brno Czech Republic.
Ondřej KauzálCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology Brno Czech Republic.
Tereza KauzálováCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Biology Brno Czech Republic.
Francis Njie MotombiMt Cameroon National Park Buea Cameroon.
Francis Luma EwomeMt Cameroon National Park Buea Cameroon.
Michal FerencDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic.
Kryštof ChmelDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic.
Jiří MlíkovskýDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic.
Jan RiegertFaculty of Science University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-1278
Solange Mekuate KamgaFaculty of Science, Laboratory of Applied Biology & Ecology University Dschang Dschang Cameroon.
David HořákDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science Charles University of Prague Prague Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-1617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevational gradients offer valuable opportunities to investigate biodiversity patterns and the ecological and evolutionary processes that shape them. Although tropical mountains are recognized as biodiversity hotspots, the various dimensions of biodiversity in these systems, particularly in equatorial Africa, remain poorly understood. In this study, we examined the functional (FD) and phylogenetic diversity (PD) of bird assemblages along a primary forest elevational gradient in Cameroon, West-Central Africa, spanning from lowland forests to the treeline (~2300 m a.s.l.). We analyzed how FD and PD vary with elevation and tested the roles of abiotic filtering and biotic interactions, such as competition, in community assembly. Additionally, we assessed whether taxonomic diversity (TD) increases through niche packing or expansion, based on morphological and resource-use traits. Using null models and bird occurrence data, we inferred the drivers of FD and PD patterns and evaluated whether species in more diverse assemblages occupied novel functional space compared to less diverse assemblages. Our results showed that both functional richness and TD declined with elevation, whereas functional nearest neighbor distance, functional evenness, and mean nearest taxon distance increased. Traits related to resource use suggested that bird species at higher elevations were functionally less similar than expected by chance, partially supporting the influence of competition consistent with the guild assembly rule. Phylogenetic clustering observed at both low and high elevations pointed to independent species radiations, likely shaped by historical forest dynamics. In species-rich lowland assemblages, we found evidence of niche packing, suggesting increased specialization or niche overlap. In contrast, niche expansion appeared to contribute to higher TD at elevated sites. Overall, our findings indicate that while abiotic filters along forested elevational gradients and competition in lowland forests play roles in shaping avian diversity, they are not the sole or dominant mechanisms. Nonetheless, partial support for competition aligns with theoretical expectations under the guild assembly framework.

Indexed as

Africacommunity assemblycompetitionelevational gradientenvironmental filteringfunctional diversityguild assembly rulephylogenetic diversitytropical forest

Identifiers

PMID40896106
PMCPMC12391590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.