ArticleEcology and evolution2025
The Temporal and Spatial Responses of Large and Medium Mammals to Anthropogenic Disturbances in Montane Southwest China.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Temporal and Spatial Responses of Large and Medium Mammals to Anthropogenic Disturbances in Montane Southwest China.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans, as super predators, influence wildlife behavior through both direct predation and indirect fear effects, prompting spatial and temporal adaptations. In landscapes where human-wildlife coexistence is prevalent, understanding the spatiotemporal strategies employed by rare wildlife in response to anthropogenic disturbance is essential for effective biodiversity conservation. From July 2019 to September 2024, we deployed 62 camera traps in the Kazila Mountain region of Yajiang County, Sichuan Province, resulting in 6204 independent detections of rare wildlife and 722 recorded human activity events. Using occupancy modeling and kernel density estimation, we evaluated the influence of human presence and environmental variables on the behavior of forest-dwelling wildlife in the mountainous areas of southwestern China. Our camera traps recorded six herbivore species (e.g., tufted deer, sambar), nine carnivore species (e.g., red fox, leopard), and five omnivore species (e.g., wild boar, rhesus macaque). Representative species from each trophic group were selected for detailed analysis based on detection frequency. Temporally, all three groups exhibited distinct diel activity peaks that differed significantly from those of human activity. Carnivores (leopard, red fox) and herbivores (sambar, tufted deer) altered their activity rhythms in response to human presence, while omnivores (wild boar, rhesus macaque) showed substantial overlap with human activity periods but avoided peak disturbance times. Spatially, carnivores tended to use areas with greater human and livestock presence, whereas herbivores preferred locations further from roads and settlements, typically in gentler terrain. Among omnivores, rhesus macaques avoided areas with high human and livestock activity, while wild boars appeared largely unaffected by such disturbances. These findings offer important insights into the conservation of rare wildlife in the mountainous regions of southwest China. This study underscores the utility of camera traps in directly monitoring human disturbance and quantifying its ecological impacts. The differential spatiotemporal responses observed among threatened medium- and large-sized mammals highlight their behavioral plasticity in disturbed environments, aiding predictions of species' responses to future environmental change based on current adaptation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.