ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Morphological Composition Influences Redundancy, Complementarity and Ecological Relevance of Habitat Complexity Metrics in Simulated Coral Communities.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earth's most complex and biodiverse ecosystems are characterised by high habitat complexity. On coral reefs, habitat complexity is influenced by the diverse morphology and composition of hard corals, shaping reef structure and shelter provision for many species. Various metrics are used to quantify reef complexity, yet, it remains unclear how well these metrics capture ecological functions such as shelter provision. We used a published dataset of 13 distinct coral community types generated using a 3D functional-structural model to investigate the redundancy, complementarity and ecological relevance of 11 habitat complexity metrics (seven ecologically meaningful shelter metrics and four more general structural metrics). We were especially interested in the extent to which structural metrics predicted shelter metrics, potentially reducing the need for more complicated and direct shelter measurements. We used Pearson's correlations to compare metrics in (i) one pooled analysis from all community types, and (ii) 13 individual analyses for each community type. In the pooled analysis, structural metrics were strongly correlated, while the shelter metrics formed two distinct groups-'pelagic' and 'benthic.' Within these groups, the metrics were highly correlated indicating redundancy, but between groups, they showed weak correlations indicating complementarity. For individual community types, the redundancy or complementarity of these metrics varied with coral morphology. Structural metrics were useful predictors of shelter metrics for certain community types; for example, surface rugosity was a strong predictor of shelter volume for tabular and digitate coral communities but not for other communities. Fractal dimension was highly complementary to other metrics, but further investigation is needed to identify its ecological relevance. We highlight that there is no universal metric, and it is important to consider a range of suitable habitat complexity metrics and morphological community composition for ecosystems with morphologically distinct biogenic habitat formers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.