Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896084›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Shining a Light on Patterns of Photoperiod Sensitivity in Germination and Flowering Across Latitudes, Ecosystems and Functional Traits.

Ashika Perrin, Angela T Moles, Catherine A Offord, Eve Slavich, Karen Zeng, Susan E Everingham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashika PerrinEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Angela T MolesEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2041-7762
Catherine A OffordEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Eve SlavichEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Karen ZengEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Susan E EveringhamEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-2700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In photoperiod sensitive plants, the timing of phenological events depends primarily on day length rather than temperature, precipitation or other environmental variables. This may make these photoperiod sensitive species less able to respond to climate change as their phenologies are more tightly controlled by day length conditions, which remain constant into the future, than by changing climatic conditions. We measured germination under three light treatments (short-day, long-day and equal light and dark) to quantify species' germination photoperiod sensitivity. We developed a novel metric that provides a continuous measure of germination photoperiod sensitivity for 67 plant species across a range of locations, habitats and growth forms. Of the 67 species, four species had significantly more seeds germinate in the long-day treatment, three species had significantly higher germination in the short-day treatment, and four species had significantly higher germination in the intermediate-day treatment. We then used this metric to quantify the relationships between germination photoperiod sensitivity (as quantified from the laboratory tests and calculated metric) and phylogeny, seed size, growth form, latitude, leaf area index (LAI) and ecosystem type. We also quantified the relationships between flowering photoperiod sensitivity (as quantified by a literature review) and the same ecological/environmental predictor variables as were tested against germination photoperiod sensitivity. There were no significant relationships between photoperiod sensitivity in germination or flowering and species' biogeography, phylogeny or other functional traits. Our findings suggest that photoperiod sensitivity is likely to be important in a range of different locations and in different types of species.

Indexed as

germinationgrowth formhabitatlatitudephenologyphotoperiod sensitivityphylogenyseed flowering

Identifiers

PMID40896084
PMCPMC12391026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.