ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Shining a Light on Patterns of Photoperiod Sensitivity in Germination and Flowering Across Latitudes, Ecosystems and Functional Traits.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shining a Light on Patterns of Photoperiod Sensitivity in Germination and Flowering Across Latitudes, Ecosystems and Functional Traits.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In photoperiod sensitive plants, the timing of phenological events depends primarily on day length rather than temperature, precipitation or other environmental variables. This may make these photoperiod sensitive species less able to respond to climate change as their phenologies are more tightly controlled by day length conditions, which remain constant into the future, than by changing climatic conditions. We measured germination under three light treatments (short-day, long-day and equal light and dark) to quantify species' germination photoperiod sensitivity. We developed a novel metric that provides a continuous measure of germination photoperiod sensitivity for 67 plant species across a range of locations, habitats and growth forms. Of the 67 species, four species had significantly more seeds germinate in the long-day treatment, three species had significantly higher germination in the short-day treatment, and four species had significantly higher germination in the intermediate-day treatment. We then used this metric to quantify the relationships between germination photoperiod sensitivity (as quantified from the laboratory tests and calculated metric) and phylogeny, seed size, growth form, latitude, leaf area index (LAI) and ecosystem type. We also quantified the relationships between flowering photoperiod sensitivity (as quantified by a literature review) and the same ecological/environmental predictor variables as were tested against germination photoperiod sensitivity. There were no significant relationships between photoperiod sensitivity in germination or flowering and species' biogeography, phylogeny or other functional traits. Our findings suggest that photoperiod sensitivity is likely to be important in a range of different locations and in different types of species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.