Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896061›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Benign Choledochal Cyst Management in Adults: General Surgeons' Perspective in a Non-Tertiary Centre.

Md M Buksh, Ahmad Al Samaraee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Md M BukshGeneral Surgery, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, GBR.
Ahmad Al SamaraeeGeneral Surgery, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholedochal cysts (ChDCs) in adults are rare and mostly benign. Their management involves having either extensive surgery in tertiary centres or conservative long-term surveillance in general hospitals. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the ideal management approach to adopt in practice. This study explored our experience in this context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This three-year retrospective study was conducted in a district general hospital in the West. The database of magnetic resonance scans of the pancreaticobiliary territory in adults over the study period was reviewed. Patients diagnosed with choledochal cysts through these scans were included in the final analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the collected quantitative data.

resultsTwo thousand thirteen relevant scans were reviewed. Twenty-nine (1.44%) scans showed various types of ChDCs, where the patients' mean age was around 48 years, the female to male ratio was (2.6:1), 70% were Caucasian and around 51% had Type I ChDC. Abdominal pain was the main associated symptom in around half of them. None of the patients had objective evidence of malignancy that would warrant ChDC excision, while one-third had gallstones that necessitated cholecystectomy. All patients had conservative management and were still under surveillance at the end of this study. Neither mortality nor serious morbidity was reported.

conclusionsOur findings are consistent with other studies, although we found higher incidence of ChDCs in Caucasians perhaps due to geographical reasons. With the current gap in the literature, we encourage other units to publish their similar experiences. This can help in standardisation of the management protocols of this rare pathology in adults.

Indexed as

bile ductbiliary cystcholangiocarcinomacholedochal cystcongenital biliary dilatations

Identifiers

PMID40896061
PMCPMC12398408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.