ReviewCureus2025
The Sociocultural Determinants of Cervical Cancer Outcomes in India: A Critical Review of Diagnostic Delays and Treatment Disparities.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-magnification digital colposcopy image datasets for cervical cancer screening in Nigeria.Data in brief · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a major health concern in India, despite being preventable through human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and routine screening. This review examines the key barriers that prevent early detection and treatment, focusing on healthcare system challenges, sociocultural influences, and economic factors. The findings highlight that many women, especially those from rural and lower-income communities, do not have access to proper screening or vaccination due to a lack of awareness, financial difficulties, and inadequate healthcare facilities. Cultural stigma and misinformation about HPV vaccines further discourage preventive measures. The healthcare system itself faces limitations, including a shortage of trained medical professionals, insufficient screening programs, and delays in diagnosis. Many women are only diagnosed when the disease has already progressed, making treatment less effective. Regional differences also play a role, with some states having better access to care while others struggle with limited resources. To reduce the impact of cervical cancer in India, this review suggests increasing awareness through community-based education programs, integrating HPV vaccines into the national immunization plan, and improving access to screening facilities, especially in rural areas. Training healthcare workers to educate and encourage women to get screened and vaccinated can also lead to better outcomes. Mobile screening units and digital health initiatives can help further reach underserved populations. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions, understanding the reasons behind vaccine hesitancy, and exploring new ways to improve healthcare access for women. A coordinated approach involving the government, healthcare providers, and community organizations is necessary to ensure that all women, regardless of their background, have access to life-saving prevention and treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.