ReviewCureus2025
Outcomes of Cross-Leg Flap Use in Lower Limb Salvage in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review of Indications, Limitations, and Success Rates.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-leg flaps remain a vital reconstructive option in the management of complex lower limb injuries, particularly in settings where microsurgical techniques are unavailable or unaffordable. This systematic review evaluates the outcomes, indications, limitations, and success rates of cross-leg flap use in lower limb salvage within resource-limited settings. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies published up to July 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Seven studies encompassing a total of 726 patients were included, comprising case reports, case series, retrospective cohorts, and systematic reviews. Trauma was the most common indication for reconstruction, and fasciocutaneous flaps were the predominant type used. External fixators were frequently employed for limb immobilization, with the average time to pedicle division ranging from 20 to 62 days, depending on flap type. Flap survival rates were consistently high across all studies, ranging from 96% to 100%, with minimal reported complications. The review highlights that cross-leg flaps offer a simple, effective, and context-appropriate solution for limb salvage in low-resource environments. Despite limitations in study design and outcome reporting, the consistency of clinical success supports the continued use and teaching of cross-leg flap techniques in global reconstructive surgery. Further prospective studies are needed to standardize outcomes and refine protocols for broader application in underserved surgical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.