Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40896020›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Difference in Thigh Circumferences Between 5 and 10 cm Proximal to the Suprapatellar Border Serving as an Indicator of Joint Effusion in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Kunihiro Onishi, Shigeharu Tanaka, Atsutoshi Maki, Shinichi Taniguchi, Hiroyoshi Iwaki, Yasushi Miura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kunihiro OnishiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Osaka Orthopedic Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Shigeharu TanakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Tokyo Kasei University, Sayama, JPN.
Atsutoshi MakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Orthopedic Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Shinichi TaniguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Orthopedic Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Hiroyoshi IwakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Orthopedic Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Yasushi MiuraDepartment of Rehabilitation Science, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Knee effusion is a clinically significant symptom associated with pain and functional impairment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This study aimed to investigate whether the difference in thigh circumferences measured at two distinct proximal sites could serve as a useful indicator of "knee swelling," particularly "joint effusion," in KOA patients. In this study, knee swelling was assessed using thigh circumference, and joint effusion was quantitatively measured using ultrasonography. Methods A total of 176 KOA patients who were admitted for total knee arthroplasty between June 2023 and June 2024 were included. Preoperative assessments involved measuring the thigh circumference 5 and 10 cm proximally from the superior border of the patella using a tape measure, and quantifying suprapatellar pouch area as an indicator of joint effusion using sagittal ultrasonographic imaging. The association between the suprapatellar bursa area and femoral circumference at 5 and 10 cm proximal to the suprapatellar border, and the difference between these circumferences was determined using Spearman's correlation. Additionally, A simple linear regression analysis was performed, with thigh swelling as the independent variable and joint effusion as the dependent variable. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Data from 96 patients (mean age 73.8 ± 8.0 years; Kellgren-Lawrence grade II: 7, III: 50, IV: 39) were analyzed. The mean thigh circumference at 5 and 10 cm proximal to the patella was 40.2 ± 4.4 and 43.8 ± 4.8 cm, respectively, with a mean difference of 3.6 ± 1.2 cm. The average sagittal area of the suprapatellar bursa was 132.4 ± 98.8 mm². The correlation between suprapatellar bursa area and thigh circumference at 5 cm proximal to the superior border of the patella was not significant (r = 0.028, p = 0.789). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between the suprapatellar bursa area and thigh circumference at 10 cm proximal to the superior border of the patella (r = -0.047, p = 0.648). However, a significant correlation was found between suprapatellar bursa area and the difference in thigh circumference measurements at 5 and 10 cm proximal to the superior border of the patella (r = -0.248, p = 0.015). The regression analysis revealed a significant association only between the area of the suprapatellar bursa and the difference in thigh circumference between the two sites (p < 0.05, r = 0.258). Discussion While individual thigh circumference measurements showed no significant relationship with joint effusion, the difference between the two measurement sites was significantly associated with effusion. These findings suggest that calculating the difference between thigh circumferences may reduce the influence of muscle mass, fat, and edema, thereby enhancing the estimation of knee effusion. Conclusion Assessment of knee swelling using the difference in thigh circumference 5 and 10 cm proximal to the suprapatellar border is a useful and simple method of assessing joint effusion in patients with KOA.

Indexed as

joint effusionknee osteoarthritis/ koaknee swellingsuprapatellar bursaultrasonography (usg)

Identifiers

PMID40896020
PMCPMC12399019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.