ArticleCureus2025
Penile Entrapment Caused by Five Metallic Rings: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Penile Strangulation by Four Stainless Steel Rings Requiring Multiple Approaches for Removal: A Case Report.IJU case reports · 2026Article
- Penile Strangulation in a 68 Years Old Male by Plastic Bottleneck: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile strangulation is a rare urological emergency that can lead to severe complications such as ischemia, necrosis, and urethral injury. We present a case of a 76-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with severe penile pain and swelling after applying five metallic rings to enhance erection during sexual intercourse. The patient had a history of erectile dysfunction and had been using phosphodiesterase inhibitors with a moderate response. Physical examination revealed significant edema distal to the glans, but capillary refill and sensation were intact, indicating preserved perfusion. Initial attempts to remove the rings with lubrication and manual manipulation were unsuccessful due to the extent of the swelling. A ring cutter was used to cut through each ring while protecting the underlying tissue, and the entire process lasted approximately 90 minutes. After removal, no signs of laceration, urethral injury, or necrosis were observed. The patient was discharged with anti-inflammatory medication and oral antibiotics. This case highlights the challenges associated with the management of penile strangulation injuries, particularly when multiple metallic objects are involved. Prompt evaluation, creative procedural approaches, and multidisciplinary collaboration are critical for minimizing morbidity. Elderly individuals engaging in sexual experimentation should be informed about the potential risks associated with the use of constricting devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.