Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895955›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Penile Entrapment Caused by Five Metallic Rings: A Case Report.

Hector R Gonzalez-Carranza

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hector R Gonzalez-CarranzaUrology, Hospital Angeles Metropolitano, Mexico City, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile strangulation is a rare urological emergency that can lead to severe complications such as ischemia, necrosis, and urethral injury. We present a case of a 76-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with severe penile pain and swelling after applying five metallic rings to enhance erection during sexual intercourse. The patient had a history of erectile dysfunction and had been using phosphodiesterase inhibitors with a moderate response. Physical examination revealed significant edema distal to the glans, but capillary refill and sensation were intact, indicating preserved perfusion. Initial attempts to remove the rings with lubrication and manual manipulation were unsuccessful due to the extent of the swelling. A ring cutter was used to cut through each ring while protecting the underlying tissue, and the entire process lasted approximately 90 minutes. After removal, no signs of laceration, urethral injury, or necrosis were observed. The patient was discharged with anti-inflammatory medication and oral antibiotics. This case highlights the challenges associated with the management of penile strangulation injuries, particularly when multiple metallic objects are involved. Prompt evaluation, creative procedural approaches, and multidisciplinary collaboration are critical for minimizing morbidity. Elderly individuals engaging in sexual experimentation should be informed about the potential risks associated with the use of constricting devices.

Indexed as

ischemia of the penisparaphilic disorderspenile injurypenile strangulationpenile traumapenissexual intercoursesexual paraphiliasexual risk behaviorsvigorous sexual activity

Identifiers

PMID40895955
PMCPMC12393782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.