ArticleCureus2025
Effect of Nitrous Oxide During Oocyte Retrieval on In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is commonly used during general anesthesia for ovum pickup during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. N₂O deactivates methionine synthetase, thereby reducing the amount of thymidine available for DNA synthesis in dividing cells, which might be the reason for the low implantation rate or increased frequency of early pregnancy loss. The aim of this study is to find out the IVF outcomes after exposure to either isoflurane or a combination of isoflurane + N₂O during anesthesia administration in the oocyte retrieval procedure. Methods This retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 patients undergoing IVF procedures who received anesthesia with isoflurane + N₂O or only isoflurane. Medical records were obtained for patient data, anesthesia details, and IVF outcomes. The primary objective was to compare the pregnancy rates between the two groups. The secondary objectives included comparing fertilization rates, oocyte grades, and cleavage rates. Results The pregnancy rates and cleavage rates measured on Day 2 and Day 3 of fertilization were similar in both groups. The fertilization rate (median(IQR)) was higher in the Iso group, but the difference was not statistically significant (air - 100 (87.5-100) vs. N₂O - 100 (83.3-100); P = 0.07). The number of oocytes retrieved of Grade 1 and Grade 2 quality was similar in both groups, while Grade 3 oocytes retrieved were significantly higher in the N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.