ArticleCureus2025
Predictive Value of Clinical and CT Scan Findings for Complicated Appendicitis: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendicitis is a common surgical emergency condition. Its timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent complications like perforation and abscess formation. However, distinguishing between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis can be challenging. Clinical and imaging findings are often used, but their predictive value is still debatable. The objective of the study is to identify the predictive value of clinical and computed tomography (CT) scan findings for complicated appendicitis in patients who underwent appendectomy.
methodsA retrospective analysis of data from a cohort of patients who underwent appendectomy in a tertiary governmental hospital was conducted. The study population included patients from varied demographic backgrounds, excluding those who were immunocompromised or had an appendectomy for reasons other than appendicitis. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsOut of 256 patients, 57.4% were male and the majority were of Saudi origin (74.6%). A significant difference in the distribution of Alvarado scores between groups with complicated (6, IQR: 5-7) and uncomplicated appendicitis (5, IQR: 4-6) was observed. The logistic regression analysis revealed symptom duration, Alvarado score, and the presence of cecal and ileum thickness in CT scan as significant predictors for complicated appendicitis.
conclusionSymptom duration, Alvarado score, and the presence of cecal and ileum thickness in CT scan are significant predictors for complicated appendicitis. Healthcare professionals should consider these predictors when assessing patients with suspected appendicitis to facilitate early identification and management of potential complications. Further research is required to validate these predictors in different populations and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.