ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of an Integrated Teaching Approach in Physiology, Anatomy, and Biochemistry for Phase I MBBS Students Using the Kirkpatrick Model.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Integrated teaching methods are increasingly emphasized in medical education to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences, leading to early clinical reasoning and better learning outcomes. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated teaching-learning approach for Phase I MBBS students using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Methods This educational interventional study was conducted from September 2023 to August 2024 at Government Medical College, Datia, involving 150 Phase I MBBS students. Three core topics, Cardiac Cycle (Physiology), Heart (Anatomy), and Lipid Metabolism (Biochemistry), were covered through didactic lectures under an integrated teaching program. A pre-test and post-test design was employed to assess knowledge gain. The intervention was evaluated at three levels of the Kirkpatrick model: reaction (student satisfaction), learning (knowledge improvement), and behavior (student perceptions regarding program organization). Student feedback and faculty feedback were collected using non-validated structured questionnaires. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests in Jamovi v2.3.28, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Participants were 52% men and 48% women, with a mean age of 19.2 ± 1.1 years. Student feedback revealed high satisfaction, with the majority rating the sessions positively. Significant improvements were observed in post-test scores across all subjects (Anatomy: p = 0.036; Physiology: p = 0.001; Biochemistry: p = 0.004). Organizational aspects of the program were rated highly. Conclusion The integrated teaching approach effectively enhanced student satisfaction and learning outcomes. The findings support the inclusion of integrated teaching as a regular strategy in the medical curriculum to improve foundational learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.