ArticleShoulder & elbow2026
Comparison of different surgical stabilization methods in recurrent anterior shoulder injuries in terms of pain, proprioceptive sensation, functional status, and muscle activation.
Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was designed to compare the outcomes of Bankart, Latarjet, and Remplissage surgical procedures in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Methods: The study included 26 patients who underwent surgery for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Pain levels, proprioceptive sensation, functional status, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and muscle activation were assessed. Results: In our study, the Latarjet procedure demonstrated superior pain control, while Bankart repair was most effective in preserving proprioceptive sensation. Remplissage was the most effective method for improving functional status, showing the highest scores, whereas Latarjet had the lowest scores. In terms of ROM, Bankart repair yielded the most favorable results, whereas Latarjet had the lowest outcomes. Regarding grip strength, remplissage had the highest values, while Latarjet had the lowest. Superficial electromyography measurements indicated variations in activation levels of the deltoid and trapezius muscles, with Bankart repair showing the highest activation levels and Latarjet the lowest. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Bankart repair is superior in preserving proprioceptive sensation and ROM, whereas Latarjet is more effective in pain control and functional outcomes. Remplissage provided the most favorable results in terms of grip strength and muscle activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.