Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895811›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)

Long-term value of lecanemab to individuals and families.

Bryan Tysinger, Yifan Wei, Hanke Heun-Johnson, Julie M Zissimopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The value of timely treatment with anti-amyloid therapy for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Beyond the Cochrane review: Re-evaluating anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Long-term value of lecanemab to individuals and families.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryan TysingerPrice School of Public Policy Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.
Yifan WeiMeta Menlo Park California USA.
Hanke Heun-JohnsonPrice School of Public Policy Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.
Julie M ZissimopoulosPrice School of Public Policy Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.

Funding

USC Resource Center for Minority Aging Research (US-RCMAR)P30AG043073 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EMMA AGUILA, JENNIFER A AILSHIRE · 2012 to 2026
$10.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG043073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn assessment of the value of lecanemab for patients living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their care partners provides them and their health-care providers important information for deciding treatment initiation.

methodsWe used data from a nationally representative sample of middle aged and older Americans combined with data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) on AD progression and data on lecanemab treatment effects from Clarity AD clinical trials. We use dynamic microsimulation modeling to quantify the long-term health and economic value of lecanemab for persons living with AD and their care partners.

resultsWe quantified five measures of value: quality of life of the persons living with AD and their care partners, medical costs, caregiving costs, and earnings, and estimated that lecanemab had a value of $21,398 relative to no treatment after 4 years and $37,943 after 10 years. Extending the treatment to 48 months resulted in a value of $42,821 relative to no treatment after 4 years and $95,311 after 10 years. Forty-eight months of a similar next-generation therapy but with 50% efficacy in slowing cognitive and functional decline resulted in a value of $82,116 relative to no treatment after 4 years and $189,691 after 10 years. DISCUSSION: Over time, lecanemab treatment reduced medical costs, hours of care required from care partners, and improved quality of life. There is much value to be gained with next-generation treatments that have a larger impact on slowing decline. Considering a wider range of outcomes in future assessments will provide a more complete understanding of value to support decision making about treatment initiation and about reimbursement for payers. Highlights: There is significant value of lecanemab for persons with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia.Over time, lecanemab reduces medical costs, caregiver hours, and improves the quality of life of persons living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their care partners.A next-generation treatment for AD with similar features to lecanemab but higher efficacy, more than doubles the value.Assessing therapy value supports decision making by patients and their health-care providers.

Indexed as

disease‐modifying therapyeconomic valuequality of life

Identifiers

PMID40895811
PMCPMC12394178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.