ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Examination of the gait evaluation index using shoes with built-in motion sensors: intra-rater reliability during comfortable walking and fastest walking.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To determine the intra-rater reliability of gait evaluation data obtained using shoes equipped with built-in motion sensors. [Participants and Methods] Thirteen healthy adults were recruited and gait evaluation data (stride length, stride speed, stride duration, stance phase duration, and swing phase duration) were obtained during comfortable and fastest possible walking. Gait evaluation was repeated after a one-week interval. The intra-class correlation coefficients and systematic errors of the gait evaluation data during comfortable walking and fastest walking were determined. [Results] The test-retest gait assessment data had good intra-rater reliability. No systematic errors were observed in any of the gait evaluation data. [Conclusion] Intra-rater reliability of gait evaluation using shoes with in-built motion sensors was verified, indicating that these data can be used for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.