Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895757›Full record

ArticleDepression and anxiety2025

Characterizing Psychiatric Disorders Through Graph Neural Networks: A Functional Connectivity Analysis of Depression and Schizophrenia.

Ji-Won Lee, Ye-Eun Kim, Mikhail Votinov, Minghao Xu, Sun-Young Kim, Munseob Lee, Lisa Wagels, Ute Habel, Han-Gue Jo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Depression and anxiety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ji-Won LeeSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Republic of Korea.
Ye-Eun KimSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Republic of Korea.
Mikhail VotinovDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Minghao XuSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Young KimSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Republic of Korea.
Munseob LeeAI Convergence Research Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Lisa WagelsDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Ute HabelDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Han-Gue JoSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0974-2951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SZ) are among the most debilitating psychiatric disorders, characterized by widespread disruptions in large-scale brain networks. However, the commonalities and distinctions in their large-scale network distributions remain unclear. The present study aimed to leverage advanced deep learning techniques to identify these common and distinct patterns, providing insights into the shared and disorder-specific neural mechanisms underlying MDD and SZ. Recent advances in graph neural networks (GNNs) offer a powerful framework for analyzing brain connectivity patterns, enabling automated learning of complex, high-dimensional network features. In this study, we applied state-of-art GNN architectures to classify MDD and SZ patients from healthy controls (HCs), respectively, using a multisite resting-state fMRI dataset. The attention-based hierarchical pooling GNN (SAGPool) model achieved the highest performance, with mean accuracies of 71.50% for MDD and 75.65% for SZ classification. Using a perturbation-based explainability method, we identified prominent functional connections driving model decisions, revealing distinct patterns of the large-scale network disruption across disorders. In MDD, alterations were dominantly observed in the default mode network (DMN), whereas SZ exhibited prominent alterations in the ventral attention network (VAN). Notably, specific functional connections identified by our model showed significant correlations with clinical symptoms, particularly positive and general symptoms measured by the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) in SZ patients. Our findings demonstrate the utility of GNNs for uncovering complex connectivity patterns in psychiatric disorders and provide novel insights into the distinct neural mechanisms underlying MDD and SZ. These results highlight the potential of graph-based models as tools for both diagnostic classification and biomarker discovery in psychiatric research.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeMajor Depressive DisorderNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerSchizophreniaAdultDeep LearningFemaleGraph Neural NetworksHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40895757
PMCPMC12396894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.