ArticleDepression and anxiety2025
Characterizing Psychiatric Disorders Through Graph Neural Networks: A Functional Connectivity Analysis of Depression and Schizophrenia.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph-Based White Matter Tractometry: Methods, Applications, and the Path to Validation.Neuroinformatics · 2026Review
- Interpretable deep learning for functional MRI-based auxiliary diagnosis of major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SZ) are among the most debilitating psychiatric disorders, characterized by widespread disruptions in large-scale brain networks. However, the commonalities and distinctions in their large-scale network distributions remain unclear. The present study aimed to leverage advanced deep learning techniques to identify these common and distinct patterns, providing insights into the shared and disorder-specific neural mechanisms underlying MDD and SZ. Recent advances in graph neural networks (GNNs) offer a powerful framework for analyzing brain connectivity patterns, enabling automated learning of complex, high-dimensional network features. In this study, we applied state-of-art GNN architectures to classify MDD and SZ patients from healthy controls (HCs), respectively, using a multisite resting-state fMRI dataset. The attention-based hierarchical pooling GNN (SAGPool) model achieved the highest performance, with mean accuracies of 71.50% for MDD and 75.65% for SZ classification. Using a perturbation-based explainability method, we identified prominent functional connections driving model decisions, revealing distinct patterns of the large-scale network disruption across disorders. In MDD, alterations were dominantly observed in the default mode network (DMN), whereas SZ exhibited prominent alterations in the ventral attention network (VAN). Notably, specific functional connections identified by our model showed significant correlations with clinical symptoms, particularly positive and general symptoms measured by the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) in SZ patients. Our findings demonstrate the utility of GNNs for uncovering complex connectivity patterns in psychiatric disorders and provide novel insights into the distinct neural mechanisms underlying MDD and SZ. These results highlight the potential of graph-based models as tools for both diagnostic classification and biomarker discovery in psychiatric research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.