ArticleAuditory perception & cognition2025
Frequency Modulation Detection Thresholds are Unrelated to Individual Differences in Verbal Memory Capacity.
Article in Auditory perception & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Psychophysical measures of auditory sensitivity are often used to explain speech recognition outcomes. However, interpretation of performance on these tasks assumes that they are insensitive to other factors, such as cognitive ability. Recent studies have cast doubt on this assumption by observing relationships between cognition and performance on psychoacoustic tasks. Here, we examined the relationship between memory tasks and two tasks designed to measure frequency modulation (FM) detection to determine whether FM detection task performance reflects individual differences in memory capacity. Method: To test for a relationship between FM thresholds and memory capacity, young adults with normal hearing (N = 31, ages 19 - 40 years) completed FM detection tasks using two different designs (three alternative forced choice and Yes/No) and memory tasks (auditory digit span and visual free recall). Results: Psychometric functions differed across the two FM detection task designs and individual differences in performance were reliable, but no significant correlations were found between memory capacity and FM thresholds. Conclusions: In young adults with normal hearing encoding of temporal fine structure and memory capacity are distinct constructs. Thus, previously observed associations between psychophysical and cognitive measures may reflect the shared effects of age- or hearing-related declines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.