ReviewRSC advances2025
Mesoporous zirconium based metal-organic frameworks, a topological review.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through the gathering of metals and clusters with organic linkers, the metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) family emerges, representing highly applicable class of porous and crystalline materials in the world of chemistry. This class has the potential to shape the future of this field of science. The remarkable stability of zirconium and carboxylate ligands, coupled with the possibility of creating highly porous structures with a variety of arrangements, has led the authors to compile this review. In this study, we will investigate ten topologies that appeared in reported mesoporous Zr-Based MOFs and discuss their special properties. The applications of these structures are strongly influenced by their topologies, and the authors have concluded that understanding the topology and, more generally, the structure of MOFs helps to find the most optimal MOF for the intended application of researchers in each project.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.