Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895662›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses Toward Genetics and Genomics: A Scoping Review.

Konstantinos Mintzaridis, Evangelos Dousis, Eleni Evangelou, Maria Polikandrioti, Ioannis Koutelekos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konstantinos MintzaridisDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Evangelos DousisDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Eleni EvangelouDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Maria PolikandriotiDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Ioannis KoutelekosDepartment of Nursing, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, genetics and genomics have emerged as a pivotal force in medicine and, consequently, healthcare systems. As the largest group of healthcare providers, nurses are essential in integrating genetics/genomics into clinical practice. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward genetics and genomics significantly influence their ability to integrate genetic/genomic principles into clinical practice. The aim of this review was to identify existing literature and map key findings on attitudes and knowledge of nurses regarding genetics and genomics. A scoping review of the literature published between 2013 and 2023 was conducted, encompassing four databases. A total of 1761 records were screened, and 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were applied to summarize the studies' characteristics and findings. The majority of the eligible studies focus on nurses' knowledge, both general and domain-specific, in genetics and genomics, while fewer studies focus specifically on attitudes. Less than a quarter of the studies (22.45%) were interventional. Findings revealed that basic knowledge among nurses was consistently low, often accompanied by misconceptions and a limited understanding of genetics. Studies that incorporated educational interventions demonstrated an increase in knowledge and a positive shift in attitudes. Findings indicate that structured education in interventional studies improves nurses' knowledge and attitudes. These strategies have the potential to advance genomic competency among nurses and ultimately improve patient outcomes. This scoping review demonstrated that the subject remains under-researched, pointing to a significant gap for future research.

Indexed as

attitudesgenetic disordersgeneticsgenomicsknowledgenursesnursing

Identifiers

PMID40895662
PMCPMC12396781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.