ReviewCureus2025
Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses Toward Genetics and Genomics: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, genetics and genomics have emerged as a pivotal force in medicine and, consequently, healthcare systems. As the largest group of healthcare providers, nurses are essential in integrating genetics/genomics into clinical practice. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward genetics and genomics significantly influence their ability to integrate genetic/genomic principles into clinical practice. The aim of this review was to identify existing literature and map key findings on attitudes and knowledge of nurses regarding genetics and genomics. A scoping review of the literature published between 2013 and 2023 was conducted, encompassing four databases. A total of 1761 records were screened, and 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were applied to summarize the studies' characteristics and findings. The majority of the eligible studies focus on nurses' knowledge, both general and domain-specific, in genetics and genomics, while fewer studies focus specifically on attitudes. Less than a quarter of the studies (22.45%) were interventional. Findings revealed that basic knowledge among nurses was consistently low, often accompanied by misconceptions and a limited understanding of genetics. Studies that incorporated educational interventions demonstrated an increase in knowledge and a positive shift in attitudes. Findings indicate that structured education in interventional studies improves nurses' knowledge and attitudes. These strategies have the potential to advance genomic competency among nurses and ultimately improve patient outcomes. This scoping review demonstrated that the subject remains under-researched, pointing to a significant gap for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.