ArticleCureus2025
Anesthetic Management of a Patient With Symptomatic May-Thurner Syndrome: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is characterized by the compression of the left common iliac vein by the overlying right common iliac artery, which can lead to venous insufficiency, obstruction, and an increased risk of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). We report the perioperative anesthetic management of a 38-year-old female with symptomatic MTS who underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and lysis of adhesions for abnormal uterine bleeding. The patient had a history of persistent left lower extremity symptoms despite prior left common iliac vein stenting and was on chronic anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban. Given her history of severe postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and dexmedetomidine was utilized, along with standard induction agents and antiemetic prophylaxis. Invasive arterial monitoring was employed due to her elevated thromboembolic risk, and intermittent pneumatic compression devices were applied. The patient tolerated the procedure without complications and was restarted on rivaroxaban at discharge on postoperative day two. This case highlights key perioperative considerations in patients with MTS, including thromboembolic and bleeding risks, the timing of anticoagulation cessation and resumption, and the implications for anesthetic technique. Although no definitive evidence exists favoring one anesthetic technique over another in MTS, the use of TIVA may offer theoretical benefits that need to be researched further. In addition, the use of intraoperative measures to maintain normothermia and euvolemia was prioritized to mitigate bleeding risk. This case underscores the importance of individualized anesthetic planning and multidisciplinary collaboration when managing patients with symptomatic MTS undergoing surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.