Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895652›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Misinterpretation of High-Resolution Manometry Leading to Inappropriate Treatment of Achalasia: A Diagnostic Challenge.

Kyle Schneider, David S Braun, Prashant Kedia

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle SchneiderInternal Medicine, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
David S BraunInternal Medicine, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Prashant KediaGastroenterology, Methodist Health System, Dallas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagogastric junction outflow, characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and loss of normal peristalsis of the esophageal smooth muscle. The common clinical manifestations of achalasia include dysphagia of both solids and liquids, regurgitation of undigested food and saliva, and chest pain. It shares symptoms with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), such as a retrosternal burning sensation and dysphagia, which can delay the diagnosis. Several modalities are useful in establishing the diagnosis of achalasia, including high-resolution manometry (HRM), barium esophagram (BE), and upper endoscopy. Despite potential issues with HRM, it remains the gold standard for diagnosing achalasia, underscoring the importance of proper technique and interpretation. Improper probe placement can lead to inaccurate diagnoses. Here, we present the case of a patient with achalasia who was misdiagnosed with GERD and underwent an inappropriate Toupet fundoplication, who eventually required peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as a salvage treatment to relieve their symptoms.

Indexed as

achalasiaendoflipgastroenterologyhigh-resolution manometrypoem

Identifiers

PMID40895652
PMCPMC12399035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.