Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895637›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Effect of Different Footwear on the Knee Joint: Biomechanical Analysis and Acute T2 Relaxation Time Changes After Walking in Minimalistic and Neutral Footwear.

Jan Malus, Victor Casula, Jan Urbaczka, Dominik Vilimek, Miika Nieminen, Joe Hamill, Veronika Horka, Marketa Rygelova, Jaroslav Uchytil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan MalusHuman Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Victor CasulaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jan UrbaczkaHuman Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Dominik VilimekDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava - Poruba, Czech Republic.
Miika NieminenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Joe HamillDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.
Veronika HorkaHuman Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Marketa RygelovaHuman Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav UchytilHuman Motion Diagnostic Center, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Walking in minimalistic footwear (MF) increases mechanical loading on the knee joint, exposing it to acute stresses that may heighten the risk of early onset of knee osteoarthritis. This type of footwear can modify walking patterns in the lower limbs, further intensifying joint stress and contributing to the deterioration of articular surfaces. Purpose: First, to evaluate the differences in kinetic variables associated with the early onset of knee osteoarthritis between MF and neutral footwear (NF) during walking; second, to determine the extent of acute cartilage loading in the knee joint, particularly footwear after 45 minutes of walking in an urban environment, using magnetic resonance imaging (T2 relaxation times [T2RTs] and percentage change of loading) in weightbearing zones. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Knee forces and knee moments were obtained during walking trials of 20 healthy participants using statistical parametric mapping. The analysis focused on alterations across specific intervals of the stance phase, expressed as percentages of the gait cycle. T2RT values of cartilage were quantified using a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and immediately after 45 minutes of walking in each condition. Results: Significant differences were observed in knee force during the stance phase: (1) in the sagittal plane, greater values were between 2% and 9% and between 90% and 100%, and lower values were between 18% and 40% and between 62% and 85% in MF; (2) the frontal plane showed lower values between 7% and 14% and 98% in MF, and greater values were between 7% and 14% and 98% in MF; and (3) the transversal plane showed greater values between 0% and 9% and between 54% and 78%, and lower values were between 25% and 40% and between 81% and 100% in MF. Knee adduction moment showed significantly lower values between 0% and 8%, 32% and 90%, and >92% and 100%. Knee flexion moment showed significantly lower values between 3% and 5%, 25% and 69%, and >7% and 19% in MF. The main effect of loading in NF of cartilage showed significantly lower T2RT values in all superficial femur parts and significantly greater T2RT values in deep central tibia. MF showed significantly lower T2RT values in the superficial anterior-posterior femur in the medial cartilage compartment. Conclusion: Increased knee moments in all planes reflect the effect of an acute change to particular footwear. NF reveals a greater response to loading in weightbearing knee cartilage zones. The superficial layers appeared to be more sensitive to loading after 45 minutes of walking.

Indexed as

biomechanicsfootweargaitmagnetic resonance imagingminimalisticneutral

Identifiers

PMID40895637
PMCPMC12397610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.