ArticleJournal of public child welfare2025
Experiences with and Perceptions of the Child Welfare System During the Perinatal Period of Mothers with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Article in Journal of public child welfare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Perinatal Care for Women With Intellectual Disabilities: Clinician Insights on Involving Family Caregivers.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026Article
- "Remember One Size Doesn't Fit All": A Scoping Review of Postpartum Supports for Neurodivergent Mothers.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of the perinatal healthcare experiences of people with disability.Disability and health journal · 2025Review
- Unseen and Invisible? Issues of Recognition for Parents With Intellectual Disabilities Accessing Social Work and Social Care Services for Adults in England.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
- Pregnancy Experiences of Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Mothers with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face compounding disparities within perinatal and child welfare systems, yet their experiences at this critical intersection remain understudied. Materials and Methods: This qualitative study interviewed 16 mothers with IDD who recently gave birth to explore their perceptions and encounters with the child welfare system during the perinatal period. Results: Adverse themes emerged surrounding (a) fear of having children removed, (b) wariness of the healthcare system from some mothers, though others viewed providers as supportive, (c) insufficient assistance, and (d) trauma and stress. Conversely, positive themes included (a) support from others, including certain healthcare providers viewed as protective, and (b) believing in oneself. Discussion: The findings underscore pervasive bias and lack of disability cultural competence across both systems, compounding adverse perinatal outcomes for this population. Conclusion: Improving equitable care necessitates comprehensive policy reforms mandating professional training on disability, non-discriminatory practices, and strengths-based family preservation approaches. Implications span enhancing disability cultural competence through provider training, increasing supportive services, promoting self-advocacy and empowerment, and prioritizing family-centered, individualized care models guided by the disability community's insights. An expansive research agenda is also urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.