ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
From immune evasion to broad
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants highlights the urgent need for therapeutic strategies that can target viral evolution and leverage host immune recognition mechanisms. This study uses molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to analyze the immune evasion mechanisms of class 1 nanobodies against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, and to develop an efficient Methods: We employed MD simulations and binding free energy calculations to investigate the immune evasion mechanisms of four class 1 nanobodies (R14, DL4, V Results: MD analysis confirmed that the immune evasion mechanism of KP.3/XEC is significantly associated with the Q493E mutation, which weakens electrostatic interactions between the nanobodies and the receptor binding domain (RBD). Through our pipeline, we identified high-affinity mutants including 3 for R14, 3 for DL4, 11 for VH ab6, and 9 for Nanosota9. The optimized R14 variant L29W/S52C/A101V demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving a 62.6% binding energy improvement against JN.1 (-76.88 kcal/mol compared to -47.3 kcal/mol for original R14 nanobody) while maintaining < 15% affinity variation across variants (compared to > 40% for original R14 nanobody). Discussion: This study demonstrates that in silico affinity enhancement is a rapid and resource-efficient approach to repurpose nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants, significantly accelerating affinity optimization while reducing experimental demands. This computational approach expedites the optimization of nanobody binding affinities while minimizing experimental resource requirements. By enhancing nanobody efficacy, our method provides a viable framework for developing targeted countermeasures against evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants and other pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.