ArticleComputer speech & language2025
A systematic study of DNN based speech enhancement in reverberant and reverberant-noisy environments.
Article in Computer speech & language, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning has led to dramatic performance improvements for the task of speech enhancement, where deep neural networks (DNNs) are trained to recover clean speech from noisy and reverberant mixtures. Most of the existing DNN-based algorithms operate in the frequency domain, as time-domain approaches are believed to be less effective for speech dereverberation. In this study, we employ two DNNs: ARN (attentive recurrent network) and DC-CRN (densely-connected convolutional recurrent network), and systematically investigate the effects of different components on enhancement performance, such as window sizes, loss functions, and feature representations. We conduct evaluation experiments in two main conditions: reverberant-only and reverberant-noisy. Our findings suggest that incorporating larger window sizes is helpful for dereverberation, and adding transform operations (either convolutional or linear) to encode and decode waveform features improves the sparsity of the learned representations, and boosts the performance of time-domain models. Experimental results demonstrate that ARN and DC-CRN with proposed techniques achieve superior performance compared with other strong enhancement baselines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.