Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895512›Full record

ArticleTrauma case reports2025

Facing the challenge maxillofacial penetrating teta injury: A case report.

Shuvro Saha, Kanij Fatema Ishrat Zahan, Kazi Irfan Subhan, Gazi M Habibullah

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuvro SahaNeurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kanij Fatema Ishrat ZahanNeurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kazi Irfan SubhanNeurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Gazi M HabibullahNeurosurgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a deadly non-missile object like a teta gets impacted in the maxillofacial region, the management becomes challenging. This region has a complex anatomical structure with high vascularity and contains vital structures like the orbit and airway. To avoid ophthalmic or neurological abnormalities in addition to the risk of infection and bleeding, accurate clinical and radiological diagnosis and optimal surgical techniques with postoperative management are crucial. This paper emphasizes the significance of careful preoperative planning and a concerted effort of the multidisciplinary team in managing penetrating maxillofacial injuries. A 26-year-old man was admitted under the Department of Neurosurgery at Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH) with a teta impacted in his face just below the right lower eyelid, which travelled through the area of the right maxillary sinus, passing the internal carotid artery (ICA) and rested in the middle part of clivus just before basilar artery. We successfully removed the teta without any vital structure injury or visual problem. Penetrating injury in the maxillofacial region with teta due to interpersonal violence is uncommon because of the presence of protecting reflexes, and there is a dearth of documentation in the literature. The presentation, diagnosis, risk evaluation, surgical management, and outcome made this case unique.

Indexed as

Maxillofacial injuryNon-missile penetrating injuryTeta

Identifiers

PMID40895512
PMCPMC12396289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.