ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2024
A Robust Mixed-Effects Bandit Algorithm for Assessing Mobile Health Interventions.
Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical considerations when designing an online learning algorithm for an app-based mHealth intervention.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mobile health leverages personalized, contextually-tailored interventions optimized through bandit and reinforcement learning algorithms. Despite its promise, challenges like participant heterogeneity, nonstationarity, and nonlinearity in rewards hinder algorithm performance. We propose a robust contextual bandit algorithm, termed "DML-TS-NNR", that simultaneously addresses these challenges via (1) modeling the differential reward with user- and time-specific incidental parameters, (2) network cohesion penalties, and (3) debiased machine learning for flexible estimation of baseline rewards. We establish a high-probability regret bound that depends solely on the dimension of the differential reward model. This feature enables us to achieve robust regret bounds even when the baseline reward is highly complex. We demonstrate the superior performance of the DML-TS-NNR algorithm in a simulation and two off-policy evaluation studies.
Identifiers
40895488PMC12395203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.