Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Indirect improvement of pepino (

Bingbing Su, Huaidi Pei, Shiweng Li, Zhongming Ma, Yuliang Chen, Yubin Li, Liguang Wang, Minmin Zhang, Zhongwang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bingbing SuSchool of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China.
Huaidi PeiInstitute of Biotechnology, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Shiweng LiSchool of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China.
Zhongming MaGansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Yuliang ChenInstitute of Biotechnology, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Yubin LiInstitute of Forest Fruits and Flowers, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Liguang WangInstitute of Biotechnology, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Minmin ZhangInstitute of Biotechnology, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Zhongwang LiInstitute of Biotechnology, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To meet the both escalating production requirements of pepino cultivation and maintaining soil sustainable development through precise exploration of chemical fertilizer input amounts. Methods: A 5-month greenhouse experiment evaluated how varying nitrogen fertilization rates (0, 75, 150, 225, and 300 kg⋅ha Results: Our study revealed that the N300 treatment maximized vegetative growth (plant height, leaf and fruit dry biomass), as well as plant nitrogen and fruit calcium contents, but significantly reduced root-to-shoot ratio, vitamin C, and soluble sugars versus N0. N225 optimally balanced productivity and nutrition, and elevated nitrogen use efficiency (34.13%), per plant yield (45.60%), fruit protein (142.68%) and calcium (32.72%). N150 showed intermediate benefits with peak stem dry biomass and sugar content, while N75 provided only marginal growth stimulation. Moreover, nitrogen fertilization differentially modified soil biochemical properties, N300 treatment markedly enhanced urease (143.24%), nitrate reductase (99.38%), and sucrase (23.87%) activities, while increasing the relative abundances of Discussion: Our research provided crucial theoretical foundations for both sustainable soil management and meeting the escalating production requirements in pepino cultivation.

Indexed as

ginseng fruit (Solanum muricatum Aiton)nitrogen fertilizer inputsnitrogen fertilizer use efficiencysoil biochemical propertiessoil microorganism

Identifiers

PMID40895483
PMCPMC12391131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.