ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Complications in hip Arthroscopy: Recognizing and managing adverse events.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip arthroscopy has become an increasingly common and effective surgical technique for the diagnosis and treatment of various intra-articular hip disorders. While generally considered safe and minimally invasive, the procedure is not without risks. The increasing volume and complexity of hip arthroscopies has led to a rise in reported complications, highlighting the importance of understanding potential adverse events and their management. This Current Concepts Review aims to summarize the types, causes, and management strategies of complications associated with hip arthroscopy, emphasizing the importance of early recognition and evidence-based intervention to minimize morbidity based on the authors' experience and the available literature. Complications can be broadly categorized into neurovascular injuries, iatrogenic chondral and labral damage, fluid extravasation, deep vein thrombosis, and heterotopic ossification. Neuropraxia-particularly involving the pudendal and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves-is among the most common adverse events, often related to traction use and duration. Iatrogenic damage during portal placement or instrumentation is also significant, necessitating precise surgical technique and anatomical knowledge. Fluid extravasation, though rare, can result in abdominal compartment syndrome and requires prompt diagnosis. Effective management includes preventive measures such as appropriate patient positioning, limited traction time, and vigilant intraoperative monitoring. Though complications in hip arthroscopy are relatively uncommon, their potential impact necessitates a thorough understanding of risk factors, preventive strategies, and prompt intervention protocols. Improved surgical techniques, enhanced imaging modalities, and comprehensive training programs are essential for minimizing adverse outcomes and improving patient safety in hip arthroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.