Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895449›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Approaches and tools to measure individual-level research experience, activities, and outcomes: A narrative review.

Brenda M Joly, Carolyn Gray, Julia Rand, Katy Bizier, Karen Pearson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brenda M JolyPublic Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-8954
Carolyn GrayCutler Institute for Health and Social Policy, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Julia RandPublic Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Katy BizierPublic Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.
Karen PearsonCutler Institute for Health and Social Policy, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, USA.

Funding

Understanding Factors Influencing COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination in Immigrant Low-income and Homeless Populations and Testing Targeted InterventionsU54GM115516 · NIGMS · MAINEHEALTH · PI Frances E. Carr · 2017 to 2026
$51.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strengthening the research workforce is essential for meeting the evolving needs and challenges in the health and biomedical fields. To do so effectively, it requires an understanding of how the experiences of a researcher shift over time and how one's research career evolves, particularly as supports are put in place to foster research. This narrative review provides a summary of published individual-level assessment measures and survey tools from 2000-2024. All measures were abstracted, classified, and coded during analyses to describe the areas of focus, and they were organized into one of six research categories. The review identified a range of measures and methods across all categories. However, the measures were often narrow, focused on outputs, and not ideal for assessing the full range of experiences a researcher may have throughout their career. The most common metrics were related to research productivity and bibliometric measures. Our review of survey tools revealed a gap in comprehensive approaches available to assess an individual's research experience, efforts, supports, and impact. As efforts expand to evaluate and study the research workforce, tools that focus on a broad range of individual-level measures, tied to specific underlying constructs and drawn from the literature, may prove useful.

Indexed as

evaluation metricsmeasurementresearch careerresearcher experiencesResearcher investment

Identifiers

PMID40895449
PMCPMC12392358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.