Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895410›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025

Safer oral immunotherapy with very low-dose introduction for pediatric hen's egg allergy.

Fumi Ishikawa, Yumiko Miyaji, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Mami Shimada, Tomoyuki Kiguchi, Seiko Hirai, Yuri Endo Kram, Kazuma Takada, Kyoko Noguchi, Yusuke Inuzuka and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hazelnut oral immunotherapy in children: An Italian single-center retrospective cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Fumi IshikawaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yumiko MiyajiAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiwako Yamamoto-HanadaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Mami ShimadaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyuki KiguchiAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiko HiraiAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuri Endo KramAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuma TakadaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoko NoguchiAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke InuzukaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji ToyokuniAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayako Saito-AbeAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Miori SatoAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigenori KabashimaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyongsun PakDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Data Management, Center for Clinical Research, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Eisuke InoueShowa University Research Administration Center, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuki FukuieAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihiro OhyaAllergy Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adverse events could be a barrier to implementing oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children with hen's egg (HE) allergy, highlighting the need for safer OIT methods. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of a new OIT method in a single-center, phase II, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Children aged 1 to 18 years with HE allergy whose cumulative tolerated dose (CTD) range was greater than or equal to 0.1 g to less than 10 g in the oral food challenge test were randomly assigned to the experimental therapy (ET) group with a very low starting dose or to the standard therapy (ST) group with a fixed-quantity maintenance dose for OIT. The primary outcome was safety, measured by days on OIT before the first IgE-mediated immediate-type reaction. The OIT efficacy, the change in CTD, was to be evaluated. Results: Among 20 participants at registration, 12 (60%) and 8 (40%) participants were allocated to the ET and ST groups, respectively. Although the study was prematurely terminated because of difficulty in the safe supply of immunotherapy food, the number of days before the first IgE-mediated immediate-type reaction was more in the ET group than in the ST group ( Conclusions: OIT with a very low starting dose might be a safer approach with a low treatment burden for children with HE allergies.

Indexed as

Food allergylow-dose introductionoral immunotherapytolerance induction

Identifiers

PMID40895410
PMCPMC12396417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.