ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Safer oral immunotherapy with very low-dose introduction for pediatric hen's egg allergy.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hazelnut oral immunotherapy in children: An Italian single-center retrospective cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Article
- Does Previous Anaphylaxis Determine Differences Between Patients Undergoing Oral Food Challenges to Cow's Milk and Hen's Egg?Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse events could be a barrier to implementing oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children with hen's egg (HE) allergy, highlighting the need for safer OIT methods. Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of a new OIT method in a single-center, phase II, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Children aged 1 to 18 years with HE allergy whose cumulative tolerated dose (CTD) range was greater than or equal to 0.1 g to less than 10 g in the oral food challenge test were randomly assigned to the experimental therapy (ET) group with a very low starting dose or to the standard therapy (ST) group with a fixed-quantity maintenance dose for OIT. The primary outcome was safety, measured by days on OIT before the first IgE-mediated immediate-type reaction. The OIT efficacy, the change in CTD, was to be evaluated. Results: Among 20 participants at registration, 12 (60%) and 8 (40%) participants were allocated to the ET and ST groups, respectively. Although the study was prematurely terminated because of difficulty in the safe supply of immunotherapy food, the number of days before the first IgE-mediated immediate-type reaction was more in the ET group than in the ST group ( Conclusions: OIT with a very low starting dose might be a safer approach with a low treatment burden for children with HE allergies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.