Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895390›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025

Diagnostic performance of dual-layer spectral CT Radiomics and deep learning for differentiating osteoblastic bone metastases from bone islands.

Yuchao Xiong, Wei Guo, Xuwen Zeng, Fan Xu, Li Wu, Jiahui Ou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuchao XiongDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), 396 Tongfu road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510220, China.
Wei GuoDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430063, China.
Xuwen ZengDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), 396 Tongfu road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510220, China.
Fan XuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), 396 Tongfu road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510220, China.
Li WuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), 396 Tongfu road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510220, China.
Jiahui OuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), 396 Tongfu road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510220, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of radiomic features derived from dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (DLSCT) and a deep learning (DL) model applied to conventional CT images in the differentiation of osteoblastic bone metastases (OBM) from bone islands (BI). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with osteogenic lesions who underwent DLSCT examinations between March 2023 and September 2023. We extracted first-order radiomic features (e.g., mean, maximum, entropy) from both conventional and spectral images. A previously validated DL model was applied to the conventional CT images. We evaluated diagnostic performance using ROC curve analysis, comparing AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The study included 216 lesions from 94 patients (66 ± 12 years; 48 males, 46 females): 125 BI and 91 OBM lesions. Significant differences were observed between OBM and BI groups for the mean, maximum, entropy, and uniformity of first-order radiomic features (all P < 0.05). DLSCT (entropy from VMI40keV) and the DL model had comparable AUCs (0.93 vs. 0.96; P = 0.274). However, DLSCT showed superior sensitivity (92 % vs. 62 %; P = 0.002) but comparable specificity (88 % vs. 96 %; P = 0.07) for diagnosing OBM compared to the DL model. Conclusion: Radiomic features from DLSCT differentiate between BI and OBM with diagnostic performance comparable to that of a DL model. Furthermore, VMI40keV image-derived entropy demonstrated superior sensitivity in diagnosing OBM compared to the DL model.

Indexed as

Bone neoplasmsComputed tomographyDeep learningDual-energy CT

Identifiers

PMID40895390
PMCPMC12396480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.