ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Machine Learning and Bayesian Belief Network Approach to Predicting Cervical Cancer Risk: Implications for Risk Management.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Multi-Omics Model Integrating US-Derived and WSI-Based Features to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Ovarian Cancer: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical cancer remains a major global health challenge, necessitating enhanced risk stratification and early detection methodologies. This study proposes a comprehensive predictive framework for cervical cancer leveraging advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms and Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs), illustrating the transformative role of digital technologies in healthcare and education within an increasingly digitized society. Methods: A cohort of 858 patients was analyzed, addressing data challenges, including missing values, class imbalance, and nonlinear feature interactions, that frequently compromise the reliability of predictive modeling. Methodologically, this study integrated advanced data science approaches, including multiple imputation, feature selection, and imbalance mitigation, advancing medical analytics to ensure robust model generalizability. Results: High predictive performance was observed across different cervical cancer screening tests. The combined target ML model achieved an accuracy of 95.6%, an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.958, and an F1-score of 0.945. The BBN, built upon the Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) model, demonstrated a positive prediction rate (sensitivity) of 91.3% and a negative prediction rate (specificity) of 86.8%. Discussion: These results validate the technical efficacy of the proposed framework and underscore its potential for integration into clinical decision-support systems. Beyond clinical applications, this research contributes to computational oncology by demonstrating the synergistic potential of combining probabilistic graphical models with ML techniques. The study highlights the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration between clinical experts and data scientists in creating effective AI healthcare solutions. It also emphasizes the need for upskilling healthcare workers and optimizing healthcare delivery processes to fully realize the benefits of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.