ReviewHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2025
Potential Medical and Surgical Applications of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: A Narrative Review.
Review in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Stromal Vascular Fraction Across Different Clinical Indications: A Pro-RegenerativeJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Safety profile of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in clinical use: an exhaustive literature review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adipose-derived cellular therapies, including stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), have demonstrated increasing therapeutic potential across regenerative medicine applications. This narrative review examines the current evidence supporting the use of SVF and ASCs in 2 primary clinical contexts: osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic wound healing. SVF, a heterogeneous cell population isolated from lipoaspirated fat via enzymatic or mechanical methods, and ASCs, a more homogeneous culture-expanded mesenchymal cell product, both exert regenerative effects through angiogenic, immunomodulatory, and reparative mechanisms. In OA, both cell types have been shown to significantly reduce pain and improve function, with some studies indicating cartilage regeneration on imaging. While ASCs may offer faster symptom relief due to higher purity and dosing, SVF remains a more accessible, minimally manipulated alternative with comparable long-term outcomes. In wound healing, adipose-derived therapies have been associated with accelerated closure of chronic ulcers through enhanced neovascularization, modulation of the inflammatory microenvironment, and promotion of granulation tissue and re-epithelialization. Across both indications, these therapies have shown a good safety profile, with minimal adverse events reported. The review also addresses regulatory distinctions, standardization challenges, and biologic variability, particularly in SVF preparations. Taken together, the evidence suggests the clinical utility of adipose-derived cellular therapies while highlighting the need for further standardization, long-term safety monitoring, and large-scale randomized trials to confirm efficacy and optimize clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.