ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assessing the need for general anesthesia versus inhalational sedation using modified mohan scale in pediatric dental patients.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective behavior management is vital in pediatric dentistry to ensure positive treatment in uncooperative children. General anesthesia (GA) and Inhalational sedation (IS) are some commonly used techniques, but an objective assessment tool is required to determine the most appropriate approach. Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the Modified Mohan Scale in guiding the selection between GA and IS for pediatric dental patients. Methods: Thirty children aged 3-6 years were evaluated using the Modified Mohan Scale, which considers American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, treatment complexity, number of teeth affected, behavior during radiographic imaging, parental expectations, socioeconomic status, and Frankl's Behavior Rating Scale. Mann-Whitney Results: Significant differences were found in the total Modified Mohan Scale scores between the GA and IS groups (p = 0.0001). Additionally, subscales related to the number of teeth requiring treatment (p = 0.011) and behavior during radiographic imaging (p = 0.029) showed prominent variations, with higher scores indicating a greater need for GA. Conclusion: The Modified Mohan Scale shows promising potential as a structured and consistent method for evaluating the need for GA versus IS in pediatric dental patients. The scale's application may support clinical decision-making and treatment planning. Future research with a larger sample size is recommended to validate its application for broader use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.