ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Assessment of root and root canal morphology in maxillary molars with fused roots using Cone Beam Computer Tomography (CBCT) in a Sri Lankan population.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Root fusion is considered to present when there is no evidence of periodontal space or presence of bone between the different roots of the molar at any apical level to the bifurcation area. Fused roots in maxillary molars pose important clinical implications, mainly in the field of endodontics. Based on the wide variations in previous studies done in different populations and the clinical implications, the present study is aimed to assess root and root canal morphology in maxillary first and second molars with fused roots in a Sri Lankan population. Material and methods: A descriptive study was conducted by evaluating all CBCT scans stored at Division of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental sciences, University of Peradeniya which were taken from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2019. To characterize the type of root fusion of maxillary molars, classification of Zhang et al., in 2014 was used. Results: Out of one thousand twenty upper first molars (1020), fifty two had fused roots (5.098 %) and out of one thousand ninety-six upper second molars (1096), 473 (43.15 %) had fused roots. The commonest pattern of fusion noted in first molars was type 1 (42.3 %) and in second molars was type 2 (36.9 %). Conclusion: The root and canal configurations of maxillary first and second molars in this population were consistent with previously reported data. Fused roots may present a complicated root canal system. These data may facilitate successful endodontic treatment. More studies in larger populations would provide more details in our population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.