ArticleArtificial intelligence review2025
Applications of machine learning for computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson's disease: progress and benchmark case study.
Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a vital tool for the diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (PD). This study presents a comprehensive review on the applications of ML for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of PD. We conducted a comprehensive review by searching articles published from 2010 till 2024. The risk of bias is assessed using the PROBAST checklist. Case studies are also provided. This review includes 117 articles with six categories: neuroimaging data (20.5%); voice data (40.2%); handwriting data (12.0%); gait data (14.5%); EEG data (8.5%); and other data (4.3%). According to the PROBAST checklist, only 28 articles (23.9%) have a low risk of bias. A benchmark case study is conducted for five different data modalities. We also discuss current limitations and future directions of applying ML to the diagnosis of PD. This review reduces the gap between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and PD medical professionals and provides helpful information for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.